|
|
Excellent (4 pts)
|
Good (3 pts)
|
Fair (2 pts)
|
Poor (1 pt)
|
|
Group
Cooperation
|
Group works well
together, sharing responsibilities equally. Equal contribution to the
overall effort.
|
Group works well
together, has minor conflicts and some members appear to do more of the
work than others.
|
Group has noticeable
problems working together. Group works more individually than
cooperatively.
|
One or two people appear
to be doing the work. Detrimental problems that hinder the effectiveness of
the project.
|
|
Content of
Presentation and guide book
(double
points)
|
Content is accurate and
includes more than the required topics. Includes facts from outside sources
and opinions/ideas from the group.
|
Content is just what is
necessary. It is accurate but they do not go above and beyond the
requirements.
|
Content for the most part
is accurate but has minor flaws. Some of the requirements are missing.
|
Many flaws in accuracy and
the absence of many of the specified requirements.
|
|
Creativity
|
Presents material in a
unique and captivating manner. Adds to the overall affect of the project.
Attracts the attention of the viewer (pictures, diagrams, etc.)
|
Some creativity is shown
but the majority is standard and not very appealing.
|
Creativity is attempted
but does not add to the effectiveness of the project. In some cases it may
even hurt it.
|
No creativity is shown or
completely distracts from the message of the project. Project is basic.
|
|
Integration
of Research
|
Research is shown clearly
and sited. Integration is made smoothly and makes sense. It is obvious that
the group had a good amount of research.
|
A good amount of research
is done and is shown in the project. Isn’t always smoothly integrated into
the presentation. Most research was sited.
|
Research was unclear and
choppy. Citations were seldom used.
|
Minimal and unclear
research. Few to no citations.
|
|
Quality of
presentation
|
Group is well prepared
and speaks clearly. They are enthusiastic and work together well. It keeps
the audiences attention and delivers the material in an understandable
manner.
|
Group is prepared but not
fluent (reads from cards often, etc.). Some audience members seem
interested and for the most part comprehensible.
|
Group is somewhat
prepared but reads directly from note cards. Some information is confused
and not clearly conveyed.
|
Completely unprepared,
information is confusing and incoherent. Audience seems confused and
uninterested.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
